[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090621234324.06fda564@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:43:24 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [patch update 2 fix] PM: Introduce core framework
for run-time PM of I/O devices
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:20:43 +0900
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Alan
> Stern<stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > Some more thoughts...
> >
> > Magnus, you might have some insights here. It occurred to me that
> > some devices can switch power levels very quickly, and the drivers
> > might therefore want the runtime suspend and resume methods to be
> > called as soon as possible, even in interrupt context.
>
> I'd like to call pm_request_suspend() from interrupt context. I don't
there are some really strong reasons to at least be able to call the
resume function from an interrupt handler.... shared interrupts are one
of them.
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists