[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090622154343.9cdbf23a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:43:43 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: kamezawa.hiroyuki@...fujitsu.com, nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp,
lizf@...fujitsu.com, menage@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Low overhead patches for the memory cgroup controller (v5)
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:09:00 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> This patch changes the memory cgroup and removes the overhead associated
> with accounting all pages in the root cgroup. As a side-effect, we can
> no longer set a memory hard limit in the root cgroup.
>
> A new flag to track whether the page has been accounted or not
> has been added as well. Flags are now set atomically for page_cgroup,
> pcg_default_flags is now obsolete and removed.
>
> ...
>
> @@ -1114,9 +1121,22 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> css_put(&mem->css);
> return;
> }
> +
> pc->mem_cgroup = mem;
> smp_wmb();
> - pc->flags = pcg_default_flags[ctype];
> + switch (ctype) {
> + case MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_CACHE:
> + case MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SHMEM:
> + SetPageCgroupCache(pc);
> + SetPageCgroupUsed(pc);
> + break;
> + case MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_MAPPED:
> + ClearPageCgroupCache(pc);
> + SetPageCgroupUsed(pc);
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
Do we still need the smp_wmb()?
It's hard to say, because we forgot to document it :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists