lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906231313.55057.elendil@planet.nl>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:13:53 +0200
From:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	bzolnier@...il.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide-cd: Improve "weird block size" error message

On Tuesday 23 June 2009, David Miller wrote:
> Therefore, any objections to something like this?
>
> ide-cd: Don't warn on bogus block size unless it actually matters.
>
> Frans Pop reported that his CDROM drive reports a blocksize of 2352,
> and this causes new warnings due to commit
> e8e7b9eb11c34ee18bde8b7011af41938d1ad667 ("ide-cd: fix oops when using
> growisofs").
>
> What we're trying to do is make sure that "blocklen >> SECTOR_BITS"
> is something the block layer won't choke on.
>
> And for Frans case "2352 >> SECTOR_BITS" is equal to
> "2048 >> SECTOR_BITS", and thats "4".

So basically there's garbage in unused bits?

> So warning in this case gives no real benefit.

Fine by me. I'll be glad to be rid of that error :-)
I'll give your patch a try with my next build.

But I think my patch still makes sense for those cases where the original 
error _does_ exist. Unless your patch fixes those as well, but we can't 
know that for sure, can we?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ