[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090623114438.GD17635@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:44:39 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, avi@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mtosatti@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, markmc@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] pass write value to in_range pointers
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:04:06AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> >> It will also need to support
> >> multiple matches.
> >>
> >
> > What, signal many fds on the same address/value pair?
> > I see this as a bug. Why is this a good thing to support?
> > Just increases the chance of leaking this fd.
> >
>
> I believe Avi asked for this feature specifically, so I will defer to him.
Hmm. That's hard to implement in my model. Avi, can we give up
this feature? I don't think anyone needs this specifically ...
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists