[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A40C856.2050002@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:19:34 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mtosatti@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, markmc@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] pass write value to in_range pointers
On 06/23/2009 03:01 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Ok, so for now I will just crank up the io_bus array, and we can address
> scale another day. Can I just drop patch 2/3 and let the io_bus govern
> the limit?
>
So long as we have a runtime-discoverable limit, yes.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists