[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1245759800.19816.1712.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:23:20 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>, paulus@...ba.org,
mingo@...e.hu, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [perf] howto switch from pfmon
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 14:12 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am trying to play with perfcounters in current git (actually in latest
> > mmotm). I'd like to reproduce what I previously did with pfmon, but I
> > couldn't so far.
> >
> > Something like
> > pfmon --follow-exec 'foobar' -e
> > CPU_TO_DRAM_REQUESTS_TO_TARGET_NODE:LOCAL_TO_0,CPU_TO_DRAM_REQUESTS_TO_TARGET_NODE:LOCAL_TO_1
> > -- <shell script>
> > gives the number of memory accesses to dram node #0 and #1 for all
> > processes whose name matches 'foobar'.
>
> My understanding based on recent emails on the topic is that the
> perfctr gods decreed you are not to do any of this because they cannot
> think of a use case for it, therefore none exist.
I wouldn't put it like that.
But we haven't gotten around to implementing uncore pmu stuff --
assuming that is what was meant.
What would be accurate is to say that we think uncore is a lot less
interesting that a lot of other pmu features.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists