[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1245717233.4017.21.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:33:53 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: remove pcibios_scan_all_fns()
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 16:55 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> I wonder if that would upset drivers. Assuming they can cope with just
> being given some functions, how could one generically make a function
> look present-but-dummy enough to not upset the driver?
Well, the dummy function would have a totally different vid/did, I think
that would work. In general, while I've seen drivers that -do- need to
know their real function number to get to the right registers, I haven't
seen much that also need to see function 0 "right" (or if they do, then
function 0 just needs to be plugged in the same partition and the whole
problem is somewhat moot).
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists