linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] v5 RCU: the bloatwatch edition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:46:27 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	niv@...ibm.com, dvhltc@...ibm.com, kernel@...tstofly.org,
	matthew@....cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v5 RCU: the bloatwatch edition

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 05:58:32AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:32:08AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Paul, i guess this is .32 material anyway, right?
> 
> I am personally OK with it being .32, as long as David Howells,
> Lennert Buytenhek, and Paul Mundt are OK with that schedule.
> 
It's hard to see how this is going to cause any regressions, so I don't
see any problem with this going in to 2.6.31. OTOH, it's not too
pressing, so 2.6.32 is ok for me too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/