linux-kernel - RE: PROBLEM: kernel oops with g

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <000901c9f413$70b2ece0$5218c6a0$%szyprowski@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:00:56 +0200
From:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To:	'Alan Cox' <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	'David Brownell' <david-b@...bell.net>,
	'Alan Stern' <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	'Peter Korsgaard' <jacmet@...site.dk>,
	'USB list' <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	'Kernel development list' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: PROBLEM: kernel oops with g_serial USB gadget on 2.6.30

Hello,

On Tuesday, June 23, 2009 11:55 AM, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Are there any drawbacks of disabling low_latency mode if callbacks
> are
> > done from tasklet not from interrupt?
> 
> Not really no

David: do you want to update a g_serial driver and disable the low latency
mode, or should I post a patch that does it? Or do you have other plan to
solve this issue? I tested the g_serial driver with low latency mode
disabled and it works quite fine here on ARM S3C6410.

Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/