[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1MJ8u3-00083c-TD@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:31:23 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: dhowells@...hat.com
CC: alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, dhowells@...hat.com, miklos@...redi.hu,
hch@...radead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, adilger@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] O_NOACC: open without any access
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, David Howells wrote:
> Reference count on which module? This would not take a reference on
> the device driver as it would not refer to it, but would still have
> a file struct, an inode struct and a dentry struct on the underlying
> fs.
So how about the following: provide a new open flag O_FILESYSTEM,
meaning it opens the file on the underlying filesystem instead of the
device/socket/symlink/etc...
Add a new inode->i_filesystem_fop pointer which is used instead of
inode->i_fop in case if O_FILESYSTEM. If ->i_filesystem_fop isn't set
by the filesystem, fall back to a default which returns -EBADF for all
operations (except open).
Define O_NOACC as 3. On open(..., O_FILESYSTEM | O_NOACC) require no
privileges on the file.
AFS would set up i_filesystem_fop with its ->ioctl() function. No
special handling needed for revoke()...
That would work, no?
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists