[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906231900.04660.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:00:03 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: Introduce core framework for run-time PM of I/O devices (rev. 3)
On Tuesday 23 June 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Below is a new revision of the patch introducing the run-time PM framework.
>
> The most visible changes from the last version:
>
> * I realized that if child_count is atomic, we can drop the parent locking from
> all of the functions, so I did that.
>
> * Introduced pm_runtime_put() that decrements the resume counter and queues
> up an idle notification if the counter went down to 0 (and wasn't 0 previously).
> Using asynchronous notification makes it possible to call pm_runtime_put()
> from interrupt context, if necessary.
>
> * Changed the meaning of the RPM_WAKE bit slightly (it is now also used for
> disabling run-time PM for a device along with the resume counter).
>
> Please let me know if I've overlooked anything. :-)
Well, I found quite a few problems myself, mostly related to disabling-enabling
of the run-time PM and to RPM_WAKE.
Updated patch will be sent out later today.
Best,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists