linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI: remove pcibios_scan_all

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A411F14.1080406@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:29:40 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
CC:	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: remove pcibios_scan_all_fns()

On 06/22/2009 05:34 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index f1ae247..b613cad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -1056,8 +1056,7 @@ int pci_scan_slot(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
>>   	if (dev&&  !dev->is_added)	/* new device? */
>>   		nr++;
>>
>> -	if ((dev&&  dev->multifunction) ||
>> -	    (!dev&&  pcibios_scan_all_fns(bus, devfn))) {
>> +	if (dev&&  dev->multifunction) {
>>   		for (fn = 1; fn<  8; fn++) {
>>   			dev = pci_scan_single_device(bus, devfn + fn);
>>   			if (dev) {
>>      
>
> What a good idea.  I was just looking at making this more complicated
> (due to the ARI capability).
>
> I'd like to know what the KVM / Xen / ... people think about this.
> I don't know if they rely on function 5 being able to show up out of
> the blue.
>
>    

You mean have a function 5 without a function 0?  This doesn't impact 
kvm at all.

Moreover, I see pcibios_scan_all_fns() uniformly defined as 0, so this 
patch doesn't change much, does it?

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/