[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090623093459.2204.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:25:44 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: akataria@...are.com
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hugepages should be accounted as unevictable pages.
> Looking at the output of /proc/meminfo, a user might get confused in thinking
> that there are zero unevictable pages, though, in reality their can be
> hugepages which are inherently unevictable.
>
> Though hugepages are not handled by the unevictable lru framework, they are
> infact unevictable in nature and global statistics counter should reflect that.
>
> For instance, I have allocated 20 huge pages on my system, meminfo shows this
>
> Unevictable: 0 kB
> Mlocked: 0 kB
> HugePages_Total: 20
> HugePages_Free: 20
> HugePages_Rsvd: 0
> HugePages_Surp: 0
>
> After the patch:
>
> Unevictable: 81920 kB
> Mlocked: 0 kB
> HugePages_Total: 20
> HugePages_Free: 20
> HugePages_Rsvd: 0
> HugePages_Surp: 0
At first, We should clarify the spec of unevictable.
Currently, Unevictable field mean the number of pages in unevictable-lru
and hugepage never insert any lru.
I think this patch will change this rule.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists