[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1245791749.5133.12.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:15:49 -0400
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] NFS: Correct the NFS mount path when following a
referral
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 15:42 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Trond Myklebust (Trond.Myklebust@...app.com):
> > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
> > ---
> >
> > fs/nfs/super.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c
> > index 8da7e59..daecbad 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
> > @@ -2548,6 +2548,27 @@ static struct vfsmount *nfs_do_root_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> > return root_mnt;
> > }
> >
> > +static void nfs_fix_devname(const struct path *path, struct vfsmount *mnt)
> > +{
> > + char *page = (char *) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> > + char *devname, *tmp;
> > +
> > + if (page == NULL)
> > + return;
> > + devname = nfs_path(path->mnt->mnt_devname,
> > + path->mnt->mnt_root, path->dentry,
> > + page, PAGE_SIZE);
> > + if (devname == NULL)
> > + goto out_freepage;
> > + tmp = kstrdup(devname, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (tmp == NULL)
> > + goto out_freepage;
> > + kfree(mnt->mnt_devname);
> > + mnt->mnt_devname = tmp;
>
> (looking through patch 3 a bit) is this expected to be safe because all
> callers will send in a mnt which was privately mounted as nfs root_mnt through
> vfs_kern_mount? So that at this point noone else can have a ref to
> mnt?
>
> If that isn't the intent, then this seems problematic... (If it is, it
> seems worth commenting both so that every reader doesn't feel compelled
> to verify, and so that no new callers will naively violate that
> expectation)
The call to nfs_fix_devname() is only applied to the 'mnt_target'
vfsmount, which is the one that was passed down directly from
do_kern_mount() to the ->get_sb() method. It is entirely unreferenced by
any other process since we haven't yet called 'do_add_mount()' to
publish it.
Cheers
Trond
> thanks,
> -serge
>
> > +out_freepage:
> > + free_page((unsigned long)page);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int nfs_follow_remote_path(struct vfsmount *root_mnt,
> > const char *export_path, struct vfsmount *mnt_target)
> > {
> > @@ -2574,6 +2595,9 @@ static int nfs_follow_remote_path(struct vfsmount *root_mnt,
> > mnt_target->mnt_sb = s;
> > mnt_target->mnt_root = dget(nd.path.dentry);
> >
> > + /* Correct the device pathname */
> > + nfs_fix_devname(&nd.path, mnt_target);
> > +
> > path_put(&nd.path);
> > down_write(&s->s_umount);
> > return 0;
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
www.netapp.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists