[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1245795352.17685.31312.camel@nimitz>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:15:52 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: akataria@...are.com
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hugepages should be accounted as unevictable pages.
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 14:42 -0700, Alok Kataria wrote:
> One thing that i forgot to mention earlier is that, I just need a way to
> provide a hint about the total locked memory on the system and it
> doesn't need to be the exact number at that point in time.
>
> Lee, due to this reason lazy culling of unevictable pages is fine too.
>
> Hugepages, similar to mlocked pages, are special because the user could
> specify how much memory it wants to reserve for this purpose. So that
> needs to be taken into consideration i.e it cannot be calculated in some
> way.
Could you just teach the thing to which you are hinting that it also
needs to go look in sysfs for huge page counts? Or, is there a
requirement that it come out of a single meminfo field?
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists