[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A41562F.1040901@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:24:47 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: remove pcibios_scan_all_fns()
On 06/23/09 14:49, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I think Willy was actually suggesting that you start using our
> OF/device-tree stuff though which is a slightly more invasive deal but
> might end up useful for other things in the long run :-)
>
I guess we could fake up OF-like datastructures or something, but I
don't see what wide application that would have. It might help in this
case, but its a lot more complex than just calling
pci_scan_single_device() at the appropriate place.
Do you have any other cases in mind where it would be helpful?
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists