[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5666.1245797092@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:44:52 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, hch@...radead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, adilger@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] O_NOACC: open without any access
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> That said, I do _not_ like the notion of
>
> > Add a new inode->i_filesystem_fop pointer
>
> regardless of whether it's in inode->i_op or wherever. I think we should
> just handle this in the regular "inode->f_op->open" routine, the same way
> we handle FMODE_EXCLUSIVE (O_EXCL), FMODE_NDELAY (O_NONBLOCK) and lack of
> access rights (O_NOACCESS) in the driver open routines that currently
> handle those specially (O_NDELAY is spe
Did you accidentally delete more than the word 'special' there?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists