[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1245848217.2681.8.camel@ht.satnam>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:26:57 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf stat: fix hardcoded nr_counter
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 10:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > nr_counter should be based on number of default_attrs entries.
>
> The problem is, this will cause a _lot_ of counters to be used by
> default, overloading the PMU quite significantly and reducing
> precision. The number of hw counters is chosen intentionally the way
> it is now, so that on common hardware there's no over-commit.
>
> As i suggested before, your change does make sense if introduced as
> extended event specifications to 'perf stat':
>
> -e all
> -e all-sw-counters
> -e all-hw-counters
>
> with regex wildcard support too.
>
Ok I will support it now.
> Instead, you chose to ignore my feedback and wasted my time by
> re-sending the same broken patch. If you do such things i'll have to
> start ignoring you - it is very ineffective for me to repeat every
> argument and suggestion two or more times and no other contributor
> does this ...
>
oops, I am sorry my AMD box was not able to boot because of the
regression the only machine which supports performance counter. I was
doing git-bisect on AMD box in the mean time I prepare this patch on old
Intel box.
> > Remove dead code and some code alignment.
>
> Could you please send this separately?
>
Send [PATCH -tip] perf stat: remove dead code
Thanks,
--
JSR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists