linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] nf_conntrack: Use rcu_barrier() and fix kmem_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A423108.60109@trash.net>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:58:32 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	jdb@...x.dk
CC:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dougthompson@...ssion.com, bluesmoke-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	axboe@...nel.dk, christine.caulfield@...glemail.com,
	Trond.Myklebust@...app.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	johannes@...solutions.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
	shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	bfields@...ldses.org, neilb@...e.de, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	tytso@....edu, adilger@....com, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] nf_conntrack: Use rcu_barrier() and fix	kmem_cache_create
 flags

Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Adjusting SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU flags.
> 
>  kmem_cache_create("nf_conntrack", ...) does not need the
>  SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU flag.

It does need it. We're using it instead of call_rcu() for conntracks.

>  But the
>  kmem_cache_create("nf_conntrack_expect", ...) should use the
>  SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU flag, because it uses a call_rcu() callback to
>  invoke kmem_cache_free().

No, using call_rcu() means we don't need SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU.
Please see the note in include/linux/slab.h.

> RCU barriers, rcu_barrier(), is inserted two places.
> 
>  In nf_conntrack_expect.c nf_conntrack_expect_fini() before the
>  kmem_cache_destroy(), even though the use of the SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU
>  flag, because slub does not (currently) handle rcu sync correctly.

I think that should be fixed in slub then.

>  And in nf_conntrack_extend.c nf_ct_extend_unregister(), inorder to
>  wait for completion of callbacks to __nf_ct_ext_free_rcu(), which is
>  invoked by __nf_ct_ext_add().  It might be more efficient to call
>  rcu_barrier() in nf_conntrack_core.c nf_conntrack_cleanup_net(), but
>  thats make it more difficult to read the code (as the callback code
>  in located in nf_conntrack_extend.c).

This one looks fine.

> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> index 5f72b94..438ce84 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> @@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@ static int nf_conntrack_init_init_net(void)
>  
>  	nf_conntrack_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nf_conntrack",
>  						sizeof(struct nf_conn),
> -						0, SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, NULL);
> +						0, 0, NULL);
>  	if (!nf_conntrack_cachep) {
>  		printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to create nf_conn slab cache\n");
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
> index afde8f9..56227c2 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
> @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ int nf_conntrack_expect_init(struct net *net)
>  	if (net_eq(net, &init_net)) {
>  		nf_ct_expect_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nf_conntrack_expect",
>  					sizeof(struct nf_conntrack_expect),
> -					0, 0, NULL);
> +					0, SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, NULL);
>  		if (!nf_ct_expect_cachep)
>  			goto err2;
>  	}
> @@ -617,8 +617,15 @@ err1:
>  void nf_conntrack_expect_fini(struct net *net)
>  {
>  	exp_proc_remove(net);
> -	if (net_eq(net, &init_net))
> +	if (net_eq(net, &init_net)) {
> +		/* hawk@...x.dk 2009-06-24: The rcu_barrier() can be
> +		 * removed once the sl*b allocators has been fixed
> +		 * regarding handling the SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU flag
> +		 * correctly.
> +		 */
> +		rcu_barrier(); /* Wait for call_rcu() before destroy */
>  		kmem_cache_destroy(nf_ct_expect_cachep);
> +	}
>  	nf_ct_free_hashtable(net->ct.expect_hash, net->ct.expect_vmalloc,
>  			     nf_ct_expect_hsize);
>  }
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.c
> index 4b2c769..fef95be 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,6 @@ void nf_ct_extend_unregister(struct nf_ct_ext_type *type)
>  	rcu_assign_pointer(nf_ct_ext_types[type->id], NULL);
>  	update_alloc_size(type);
>  	mutex_unlock(&nf_ct_ext_type_mutex);
> -	synchronize_rcu();
> +	rcu_barrier(); /* Wait for completion of call_rcu()'s */
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_ct_extend_unregister);
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/