| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1245867490.3181.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:48:10 +0530 From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf_counter tools: shorten names for events On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 20:07 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote: > > > > > OK, We will show : > > 'branch loads' -> 'branches' > > 'branch load-misses' -> 'branch-misses' > > > > now issue is how we can show : > > > > 'branch stores' -> ? > > 'branch store-misses' -> ? > > > > 'branch prefetches' -> ? > > 'branch prefetch-misses' -> ? > > there's no such thing as a 'branch store'. Instructions are not > stored. We shouldnt display those. > > They are prefetched sometimes speculatively ... not sure there are > events for them ... are there? > yes, you are right there is no such events. But I need to test and display all. If I need to to need to handle branch as special case, then better to make separate array for branches and remove from hw_cache array. Is it OK. Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists