[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A41CD36.8030202@hartkopp.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:52:38 +0200
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
CC: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: let SJA1000 driver depend on HAS_IOMEM
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Heiko Carstens wrote:
>> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
>> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ config CAN_CALC_BITTIMING
>> If unsure, say Y.
>>
>> config CAN_SJA1000
>> - depends on CAN_DEV
>> + depends on CAN_DEV && HAS_IOMEM
>> tristate "Philips SJA1000"
>> ---help---
>> Driver for the SJA1000 CAN controllers from Philips or NXP
>
> Hm, this Kconfig entry is not directly responsible for building
> sja1000_platform.o. It builds sja1000.o, which does not rely on
> HAS_IOMEM. It should be added to "config CAN_SJA1000_PLATFORM" instead.
Hi Wolfgang,
the question is, if we should add HAS_IOMEM to almost every SJA1000 depended
driver like SJA1000_PLATFORM, SJA1000_OF_PLATFORM, EMS_PCI and KVASER_PCI ???
Is it possible to have a support for the SJA1000 that does *not* depend on
HAS_IOMEM?
Regards,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists