[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090625084631.GA7985@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:46:31 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>,
plagnioj@...osoft.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avictor.za@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] atmel_lcdfb Kconfig: remove long dependency line
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:12:54PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Haavard Skinnemoen :
> > Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> >> +config ARCH_ATMEL_HAS_FB
> >> + bool
> >> + depends on FB
> >> + default n
> >
> > What happens when we unconditionally select something which depends on
> > something else?
>
> :-P
>
> Experience shows that this configuration is selected.
>
> The dependency allows to have a good hierarchy in the configuration tree...
> Better proposition welcome.
1st - no need for 'default n' - you're specifying something that's already
the default.
2nd - don't make this symbol depend on anything, and don't use the symbol
for anything except providing a dependency for FB_ATMEL. Instead, let
FB_ATMEL deal with the dependency on FB and ARCH_ATMEL_HAS_FB.
3rd - ISTR we have a convention for these - 'HAVE_foo' for a configuration
option named 'foo'. So it should probably be HAVE_FB_ATMEL.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists