[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A435593.1050806@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:46:43 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fbl@...hat.com, nhorman@...hat.com, davem@...hat.com,
oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] tcp: race in receive part
Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Jiri Olsa a écrit :
>> I made the modification, plz check the attached diff.
>>
>> I found some places where the read_lock is not ahead of the check:
>> "if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep))"
>>
>> I'm not sure we dont want to address those as well; located in following
>> files:
>> drivers/net/tun.c
>> net/core/stream.c
>> net/sctp/socket.c
>> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
>
> We'll take care of them later :)
>
>>
>> thanks,
>> jirka
>>
>
> This patch is OK with me, please submit a new formal patch with
> fresh ChangeLog so that we can all agree and Signed-off-by/Acked-by
>
> Oleg, I think your comment can be addressed in a followup patch ?
>
> Thanks to all
To clarify, I meant the second comment from Oleg.
Jiri, please define a "smp_mb__after_lock()" instead of smp_mb__after_read_lock()
+/* The {read|write|spin}_lock() on x86 are full memory barriers. */
+#define smp_mb__after_lock() do { } while (0)
+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists