[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0906251445200.2767@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:48:07 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf_counter tools: shorten names for events
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 21:56 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > 248064467 L1-data-Cache-Load-Referencees (scaled from 23.27%)
> > > 283542921 dL1-loads (scaled from 23.28%)
> >
> > Where is the point of this? dL1-loads is a completely non
> > intuitive artificial abbreviation.
>
> blame me :)
>
> I found L1-data-Cache-Load-References way too long and i asked for
> suggestions and came up with my list of abbreviations.
>
> I found 'dL1' intuitive because we use 'dTLB' and 'iTLB' as well.
:)
> How about L1-data-loads ?
Yeah, something like that would be nice. The ones Roland
suggested are fine as well.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists