[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090625131625.GC17690@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:16:25 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...il.com>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mike Rapoport <mike@...pulab.co.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Allow consumer supplies to be set up with
 dev_name()
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 01:11:46PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> I just wonder if we need to suggest subsystem maintainers make sure that
> their
> device names are suitably unique and identifiable?  For example, i2c device
> tend to have names like 0-0032.  Perhaps we need something to identify
> that they
> are indeed i2c devices?
Either that or if it becomes a problem we add the ability to match on
bus type as well - since bus type already exists it'd probably be better
to go down that road rather than cause userspace-visible changes.  I've
not looked in sufficient detail to confirm that this would cover
everything but I believe it should.
> For that matter, is there anything other than blind luck preventing two
> regulator
> consumers having the same dev_name?
Due to sysfs requirements I think we should be safe with the addition of
bus type matching but like I say I may be missing something.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
