[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090625132826.26748.15607.stgit@dev.haskins.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:28:27 -0400
From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, avi@...hat.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, davidel@...ilserver.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: [KVM PATCH v5 3/4] KVM: Fix races in irqfd using new eventfd_kref_get
interface
eventfd currently emits a POLLHUP wakeup on f_ops->release() to generate a
"release" callback. This lets eventfd clients know if the eventfd is about
to go away and is very useful particularly for in-kernel clients. However,
until recently it is not possible to use this feature of eventfd in a
race-free way. This patch utilizes a new eventfd interface to rectify
the problem.
Note that one final race is known to exist: the slow-work thread may race
with module removal. We are currently working with slow-work upstream
to fix this issue as well. Since the code prior to this patch also
races with module_put(), we are not making anything worse, but rather
shifting the cause of the race. Once the slow-work code is patched we
will be fixing the last remaining issue.
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
---
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 7 +-
virt/kvm/Kconfig | 1
virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
3 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 2451f48..d94ee72 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -141,7 +141,12 @@ struct kvm {
struct kvm_io_bus mmio_bus;
struct kvm_io_bus pio_bus;
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD
- struct list_head irqfds;
+ struct {
+ spinlock_t lock;
+ struct list_head items;
+ atomic_t outstanding;
+ wait_queue_head_t wqh;
+ } irqfds;
#endif
struct kvm_vm_stat stat;
struct kvm_arch arch;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/Kconfig b/virt/kvm/Kconfig
index daece36..ab7848a 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/Kconfig
+++ b/virt/kvm/Kconfig
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ config HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP
config HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD
bool
select EVENTFD
+ select SLOW_WORK
config KVM_APIC_ARCHITECTURE
bool
diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
index 9656027..ca21e8a 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/eventfd.h>
+#include <linux/slow-work.h>
/*
* --------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -36,17 +37,36 @@
* Credit goes to Avi Kivity for the original idea.
* --------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+
struct _irqfd {
struct kvm *kvm;
+ struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd;
int gsi;
struct list_head list;
poll_table pt;
wait_queue_head_t *wqh;
wait_queue_t wait;
struct work_struct inject;
+ struct slow_work shutdown;
+ int active:1;
};
static void
+irqfd_release(struct _irqfd *irqfd)
+{
+ eventfd_ctx_put(irqfd->eventfd);
+ kfree(irqfd);
+}
+
+/* assumes kvm->irqfds.lock is held */
+static void
+irqfd_deactivate(struct _irqfd *irqfd)
+{
+ irqfd->active = false;
+ list_del(&irqfd->list);
+}
+
+static void
irqfd_inject(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct _irqfd *irqfd = container_of(work, struct _irqfd, inject);
@@ -58,6 +78,55 @@ irqfd_inject(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_unlock(&kvm->irq_lock);
}
+static struct _irqfd *
+work_to_irqfd(struct slow_work *work)
+{
+ return container_of(work, struct _irqfd, shutdown);
+}
+
+static int
+irqfd_shutdown_get_ref(struct slow_work *work)
+{
+ struct _irqfd *irqfd = work_to_irqfd(work);
+ struct kvm *kvm = irqfd->kvm;
+
+ atomic_inc(&kvm->irqfds.outstanding);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void
+irqfd_shutdown_put_ref(struct slow_work *work)
+{
+ struct _irqfd *irqfd = work_to_irqfd(work);
+ struct kvm *kvm = irqfd->kvm;
+
+ irqfd_release(irqfd);
+
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&kvm->irqfds.outstanding))
+ wake_up(&kvm->irqfds.wqh);
+}
+
+static void
+irqfd_shutdown_execute(struct slow_work *work)
+{
+ struct _irqfd *irqfd = work_to_irqfd(work);
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure there are no outstanding "inject" work-items before we blow
+ * away our state. Once this job completes, the slow_work
+ * infrastructure will drop the irqfd object completely via put_ref
+ */
+ flush_work(&irqfd->inject);
+}
+
+const static struct slow_work_ops irqfd_shutdown_work_ops = {
+ .get_ref = irqfd_shutdown_get_ref,
+ .put_ref = irqfd_shutdown_put_ref,
+ .execute = irqfd_shutdown_execute,
+};
+
+
static int
irqfd_wakeup(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
{
@@ -65,25 +134,39 @@ irqfd_wakeup(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
unsigned long flags = (unsigned long)key;
/*
- * Assume we will be called with interrupts disabled
+ * Called with interrupts disabled
*/
if (flags & POLLIN)
- /*
- * Defer the IRQ injection until later since we need to
- * acquire the kvm->lock to do so.
- */
+ /* An event has been signaled, inject an interrupt */
schedule_work(&irqfd->inject);
if (flags & POLLHUP) {
- /*
- * for now, just remove ourselves from the list and let
- * the rest dangle. We will fix this up later once
- * the races in eventfd are fixed
- */
+ /* The eventfd is closing, detach from KVM */
+ struct kvm *kvm = irqfd->kvm;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
__remove_wait_queue(irqfd->wqh, &irqfd->wait);
- irqfd->wqh = NULL;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&kvm->irqfds.lock, flags);
+
+ if (irqfd->active) {
+ /*
+ * If the item is still active we can be sure that
+ * no-one else is trying to shutdown this object at
+ * the same time.
+ *
+ * Defer the shutdown to a thread so we can flush
+ * all remaining inject jobs. We use a slow-work
+ * item to prevent a deadlock against the work-queue
+ */
+ irqfd_deactivate(irqfd);
+ slow_work_enqueue(&irqfd->shutdown);
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kvm->irqfds.lock, flags);
}
+
return 0;
}
@@ -102,6 +185,7 @@ kvm_irqfd(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi, int flags)
{
struct _irqfd *irqfd;
struct file *file = NULL;
+ struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd = NULL;
int ret;
unsigned int events;
@@ -113,6 +197,8 @@ kvm_irqfd(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi, int flags)
irqfd->gsi = gsi;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&irqfd->list);
INIT_WORK(&irqfd->inject, irqfd_inject);
+ slow_work_init(&irqfd->shutdown, &irqfd_shutdown_work_ops);
+ irqfd->active = true;
file = eventfd_fget(fd);
if (IS_ERR(file)) {
@@ -129,12 +215,21 @@ kvm_irqfd(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi, int flags)
events = file->f_op->poll(file, &irqfd->pt);
- mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
- list_add_tail(&irqfd->list, &kvm->irqfds);
- mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+ list_add_tail(&irqfd->list, &kvm->irqfds.items);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+
+ eventfd = eventfd_ctx_fileget(file);
+ if (IS_ERR(file)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(file);
+ goto fail;
+ }
+
+ irqfd->eventfd = eventfd;
/*
- * Check if there was an event already queued
+ * Check if there was an event already pending on the eventfd
+ * before we registered, and trigger it as if we didn't miss it.
*/
if (events & POLLIN)
schedule_work(&irqfd->inject);
@@ -148,6 +243,9 @@ kvm_irqfd(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi, int flags)
return 0;
fail:
+ if (eventfd && !IS_ERR(eventfd))
+ eventfd_ctx_put(eventfd);
+
if (file && !IS_ERR(file))
fput(file);
@@ -158,24 +256,71 @@ fail:
void
kvm_irqfd_init(struct kvm *kvm)
{
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->irqfds);
+ slow_work_register_user();
+
+ spin_lock_init(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->irqfds.items);
+ atomic_set(&kvm->irqfds.outstanding, 0);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&kvm->irqfds.wqh);
+}
+
+static struct _irqfd *
+irqfd_pop(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ struct _irqfd *irqfd = NULL;
+
+ spin_lock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+
+ if (!list_empty(&kvm->irqfds.items)) {
+ irqfd = list_first_entry(&kvm->irqfds.items,
+ struct _irqfd, list);
+ irqfd_deactivate(irqfd);
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+
+ return irqfd;
+}
+
+/*
+ * locally releases the irqfd
+ *
+ * This function is called when KVM won the race with eventfd (signalled by
+ * finding the item active on the kvm->irqfds.item list). We are now guaranteed
+ * that we will never schedule a deferred shutdown task against this object,
+ * so we take steps to perform the shutdown ourselves.
+ *
+ * 1) We must remove ourselves from the wait-queue to prevent further events,
+ * which will simultaneously act to sync us with eventfd (via wqh->lock)
+ * 2) Flush any outstanding inject-tasks to ensure its safe to free memory
+ * 3) Delete the object
+ */
+static void
+irqfd_shutdown(struct _irqfd *irqfd)
+{
+ remove_wait_queue(irqfd->wqh, &irqfd->wait);
+ flush_work(&irqfd->inject);
+ irqfd_release(irqfd);
}
void
kvm_irqfd_release(struct kvm *kvm)
{
- struct _irqfd *irqfd, *tmp;
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(irqfd, tmp, &kvm->irqfds, list) {
- if (irqfd->wqh)
- remove_wait_queue(irqfd->wqh, &irqfd->wait);
+ struct _irqfd *irqfd;
- flush_work(&irqfd->inject);
+ /*
+ * Shutdown all irqfds that still remain
+ */
+ while ((irqfd = irqfd_pop(kvm)))
+ irqfd_shutdown(irqfd);
- mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
- list_del(&irqfd->list);
- mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
+ /*
+ * irqfds.outstanding tracks the number of outstanding "shutdown"
+ * jobs pending at any given time. Once we get here, we know that
+ * no more jobs will get scheduled, so go ahead and block until all
+ * of them complete
+ */
+ wait_event(kvm->irqfds.wqh, (!atomic_read(&kvm->irqfds.outstanding)));
- kfree(irqfd);
- }
+ slow_work_unregister_user();
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists