[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A438522.7040309@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:09:38 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prevent to reclaim anon page of lumpy reclaim for no
swap space
Minchan Kim wrote:
> This patch prevent to reclaim anon page in case of no swap space.
> VM already prevent to reclaim anon page in various place.
> But it doesnt't prevent it for lumpy reclaim.
>
> It shuffles lru list unnecessary so that it is pointless.
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 026f452..fb401fe 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -830,7 +830,13 @@ int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, int mode, int file)
> * When this function is being called for lumpy reclaim, we
> * initially look into all LRU pages, active, inactive and
> * unevictable; only give shrink_page_list evictable pages.
> +
> + * If we don't have enough swap space, reclaiming of anon page
> + * is pointless.
> */
> + if (nr_swap_pages <= 0 && PageAnon(page))
> + return ret;
> +
Should that be something like this:
if (nr_swap_pages <= 0 && (PageAnon(page) && !PageSwapCache(page)))
We can still reclaim anonymous pages that already have
a swap slot assigned to them.
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists