[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A439029.10601@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:56:41 -0400
From: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, avi@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mtosatti@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, markmc@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v8 1/3] KVM: make io_bus interface more robust
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:22:29AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
>> Gregory Haskins wrote:
>>
>>> Today kvm_io_bus_regsiter_dev() returns void and will internally BUG_ON if it
>>> fails. We want to create dynamic MMIO/PIO entries driven from userspace later
>>> in the series, so we need to enhance the code to be more robust with the
>>> following changes:
>>>
>>> 1) Add a return value to the registration function
>>> 2) Fix up all the callsites to check the return code, handle any
>>> failures, and percolate the error up to the caller.
>>> 3) Add an unregister function that collapses holes in the array
>>>
>
> Does not unregister need rcu bus fixes to work?
>
>
Not without users ;)
But, hmm. Perhaps I should re-split out the return value stuff so it
can go independent of the unregister. Gah, this io_bus is a nightmare.
-Greg
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (267 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists