[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1245942713.9157.2.camel@hpdv5.satnam>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:41:53 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf_counter tools: shorten names for events
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 08:05 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > This still looks ugly and lines are again long check for
> > 'L1-dcache-prefetch-misses' and does not solve the purpose :
> >
> > Performance counter stats for 'ls -lR /usr/include/':
> >
> > 254259235 L1-dcache-loads (scaled from 22.69%)
> > 1129360 L1-dcache-load-misses (scaled from 23.05%)
> > 151929 L1-dcache-stores (scaled from 22.94%)
> > 395089 L1-dcache-prefetches (scaled from 23.30%)
> > 273699 L1-dcache-prefetch-misses (scaled from 23.19%)
> > 253780608 L1-icache-loads (scaled from 23.07%)
> > 4014781 L1-icache-load-misses (scaled from 23.16%)
>
> But even the longest line there (dcache-prefetch-misses) is only 64
> columns long, so you could just align the "(scaled" part a little
> further to the right and keep the output under, say, 72 columns.
>
BTW, this is a shorten patch not widen patch ;-)
L1d and L1i is self explanatory.
If iTLB and dTLB are valid then why not L1d and L1i ?
Thanks,
--
JSR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists