[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090625234846.1b987069@dxy.sh.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:48:46 +0800
From: Alek Du <alek.du@...el.com>
To: Jani Nikula <ext-jani.1.nikula@...ia.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Trilok Soni <soni.trilok@...il.com>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"ben-linux@...ff.org" <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]input: Change timer function to workqueue for gpio_keys
driver
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:42:08 +0800
Jani Nikula <ext-jani.1.nikula@...ia.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:09 +0200, ext Alek Du wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:05:55 +0800
> > Jani Nikula <ext-jani.1.nikula@...ia.com> wrote:
> > > Actually scrap that, the input layer already ignores events with no
> > > state changes, right?
> > >
> > Yes, correct. I just want to reply your previous mail, but seems you find that. :-)
>
> The point about your patch breaking debouncing is still valid, though.
>
>
How? If IRQ triggered then the delay work scheduled, after debouncing time, in work, it checks GPIO pin state again,
if pin is active, send "1" to input layer -- key pressed, if de-active, send "0" -- no event.
I really did test on my board, could you also try it out?
Thanks,
Alek
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists