lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
cc:	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, mst@...hat.com,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	avi@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] eventfd: add internal reference counting to fix
 notifier race conditions

On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Rusty Russell wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:15:11 am Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > Some components would like to know if userspace dropped the fd, and take
> > proper action accordingly (release resources, drop module instances,
> > etc...).
> 
> Like to know?  Possibly.  Need to know?  Not anything I've seen so far.
> 
> If userspace creates the fd, component grab a ref and if userspace wants that 
> fd completely freed must close the fd *and* tell component.  Simple, race free 
> and explicit.  All wins.
> 
> As this discussion shows, doing some kind of implies non-reference is hard, 
> complex and racy.

Easier, we agree. Not doing anything is always easier, provided the 
userspace interface allows for it.
Cleaner, I'm not sure. Again, it depends from the userspace interface, but 
usually when you close(2) something, you expect the kernel to react 
accordingly, and not on relying on userspace issuing extra calls in order 
to proper cleanup the kernel context.
This is even more true when the eventfd is the sole handle to the visisble 
userspace interface.
In such cases, not taking proper action on close(2) and requiring extra 
calls, would lead to designing interface with the close-no-really-i-mean-it
patterns.



- Davide


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ