[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1fxdoqkec.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:43:23 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: John Robinson <john.robinson@...nymous.org.uk>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] REQUEST for new 'topology' metrics to be moved out of the 'queue' sysfs directory.
>>>>> "John" == John Robinson <john.robinson@...nymous.org.uk> writes:
John> Even sadder, when a raid 0/4/5/6 is reshaped over more discs (and
John> probably other scenarios outwith md),
I'm not sure I agree with the whole "sad" sentiment. Just because
ext[234] doesn't query devices automatically doesn't mean the technology
doesn't exist. I wrote the MD/LVM extraction code for XFS in 2001.
John> both stripe-width and stride-size change. Is there any prospect
John> this new stacking could give us the opportunity to tell our client
John> (LVM, filesystem, whatever) about the change, or that they'll be
John> able to take advantage of it?
When you resize the fs it would have to compare the new topology to the
old one and adjust accordingly.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists