[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090625204433.GA16384@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:44:33 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in arch/x86/include/asm/boot.h [Was: next cleanup report: "bad" references to CONFIG variables]
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 03:27:18PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > If you continue this then please filter the know false positives.
> > For once start ignoring defconfigs.
>
> just to be clear, yes, there are numerous output lines from
> defconfig files, but a simple entry in a defconfig file can never
> *contribute* to something being flagged as bad or unused. all those
> lines represent is the subsequent global search once something *has*
> been flagged as unused or bad, just to show where it occurs anywhere
> in the tree (which is sometimes informative).
>
> if a variable occurred *only* in defconfig files, it would be
> ignored and nothing would be printed for it. but if that defconfig
> output has no value, i can toss it.
It only indicates that the defconfig is old.
And this is irellevant for this - so toss it.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists