[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A43F60D.2040801@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:11:25 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, arjan@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
npiggin@...e.de, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: upcoming kerneloops.org item: get_page_from_freelist
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:26:28PM +0200, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> IIRC there was also a good reason for this in the past, related to
>> the buffers being submitted to the block device layer, and if they
>> were allocated from the slab cache with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB or something
>> similar enabled the buffer would be misaligned and cause grief.
>
> So what does SLAB/SLUB/SLOB do if we create a slab cache which is a
> power of two? Can one of the allocators still return misaligned
> blocks of memory in some circumstances?
>
> - Ted
ecryptfs used to do kmalloc(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) & virt_to_page on that, and
with SLUB + slub debug, that gave back non-aligned memory, causing
eventual corruption ...
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists