linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET] percpu: generalize first chunk allocators and improve lpage NUMA support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A42C131.6040007@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:13:37 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	tglx@...utronix.de, cl@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] percpu: generalize first chunk allocators and improve
 lpage NUMA support

Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> Haven't read the new patches, but per cpu data always was sized
> for all possible CPUs.
> 
>> and N is large, what did it cost?
> 
>> And what are reasonable values of N?
> 
> N should normally not be large anymore, since num_possible_cpus() 
> is sized based on firmware information now.
> 

*Ahem* virtual machines *ahem*...

I have discussed this with Tejun, and the plan is to allocate the percpu
information when a processor is first brought online (but not removed
when it is offlined again.)  It's a real problem for 32-bit VMs, so it's
more important than you'd think.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/