[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090626084225.GA12201@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:42:25 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] vfs: Add better VFS support for page_mkwrite when blocksize < pagesize
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 01:47:55PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:17:53PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Basically the problems is that i_op->truncate a) cannot return an error
> > (which is causing problems missing -EIO today anyway), and b) is called
> > after i_size update which makes it not possible to error-out without
> > races anyway, and c) does not get the old i_size so you can't unmap the
> > last partial page with it.
> >
> > My patch is basically moving ->truncate call into setattr, and have
> > the filesystem call vmtruncate. I've jt to clean up loose ends.
>
> We absolutely need to get rid of ->truncate. Due to the above issues
> XFS already does the majority of the truncate work from setattr, and it
> works pretty well.
Yes well we could get rid of ->truncate and have filesystems do it
themselves in setattr, but I figure that moving truncate into
generic setattr is helpful (makes conversions a bit easier too).
Did you see my patch? What do you think of that basic approach?
> The only problem is the generic aops calling
> vmtruncate directly.
What should be done is require that filesystems trim blocks past
i_size in case of any errors. I actually need to fix up a few
existing bugs in this area too, so I'll look at this..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists