linux-kernel - Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090626110722.7ca2e8c4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:07:22 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, jdike@...toit.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

Hi Boaz,

On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:57:08 +0300 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:
>
> On 06/25/2009 06:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I applied the following patch to yesterday's linux-next and the i386 uml
> > defconfig build succeeded.
> 
> Stephan Hi, 
       ^
Stephen :-)

> Does this means that there will be a UML build every linux-next now?

Yes,  I will also see if the x86_64 UML will build.  I know the PPC one
won't (does anyone care?).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped