[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F07556412B895@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:48:57 -0700
From: "Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 9/9] x86/apic: support moorestown interrupt subsystem
>
>This code is stylistically and structurally challenged and will need
>a lot more work to be acceptable. Please clean it up and abstract
>out the timer driver bits:
>
>The proper solution here is to first introduce a proper abstraction
>without adding the ABP bits - then can come a separate ABP patch
>that adds the new hardware support - without touching any other code
>but adding its own small driver module.
>
> Ingo
[[JPAN]] thanks for the detailed comments, I will fix the style problem in the
next version. I can separate APB timer code into another patch. But I need
a little more clarification for the abstraction you want. The reason why I did
it this way was it is similar to the other arch_setup_xx, e.g. HPET. In
io_apic.c
So do you want to abstract all the arch_setup_xxx in the new abstraction layer?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists