[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090626144949.GA24173@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:49:49 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...l.by>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kobject_set_name_vargs memory leak
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:36:52PM +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello.
> I suppose this patch fixes memory leak in kobject.c
> Correct me if I'm wrong.
> Thanks.
> -----------
>
> Fix memory leak when kobject_set_name_vargs returns -ENOMEM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...l.by>
> ---
> diff --git a/lib/kobject.c b/lib/kobject.c
> index b512b74..922cd8c 100644
> --- a/lib/kobject.c
> +++ b/lib/kobject.c
> @@ -222,8 +222,10 @@ int kobject_set_name_vargs(struct kobject *kobj, const char *fmt,
> return 0;
>
> kobj->name = kvasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, fmt, vargs);
> - if (!kobj->name)
> + if (!kobj->name) {
> + kfree(old_name);
> return -ENOMEM;
> + }
We've been through this before (search lkml archives). If kvasprintf
fails, then we don't want to free old_name, as the caller might want to
do something with it.
Or something along those lines, I can't remember the exact reasoning
this early in the morning.
Kay, do you remember?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists