[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090626015205.GE28176@x200.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:52:05 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] IA64 Compilation Error Fix for Intel IOMMU Identity
Mapping Support
* Linus Torvalds (torvalds@...ux-foundation.org) wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Chris Wright wrote:
> >
> > From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] intel-iommu: fix Identity Mapping to be arch independent
> >
> > Drop the e820 scanning and use existing function for finding valid RAM
> > regions to add to 1:1 mapping.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>
>
> Is this tested on something that actually uses IOMMU?
>
> If so, of the patches I've seen so far, this is obviously my favorite.
I tested it on x86; works fine and creates a slightly tighter set of page
tables (matching to e820). But I don't have an IA-64 box w/ an IOMMU.
It does have one problem, however, the graphics work around code isn't
compiled in on IA-64, so it needs:
(a) a small ifdef move
(b) to be tested on IA-64, since my hypothesis was based on the fact that
it was already being used on IA-64
Here's v2, fixing (a) above (compile tested on IA-64), still needing (b).
thanks,
-chris
---
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] intel-iommu: fix Identity Mapping to be arch independent
Drop the e820 scanning and use existing function for finding valid RAM
regions to add to 1:1 mapping.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>
---
drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c | 19 +++++--------------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
index e53eacd..420afa8 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
#include <linux/sysdev.h>
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
#include <asm/iommu.h>
-#include <asm/e820.h>
#include "pci.h"
#define ROOT_SIZE VTD_PAGE_SIZE
@@ -1908,7 +1907,6 @@ static inline int iommu_prepare_rmrr_dev(struct dmar_rmrr_unit *rmrr,
rmrr->end_address + 1);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_DMAR_GFX_WA
struct iommu_prepare_data {
struct pci_dev *pdev;
int ret;
@@ -1943,6 +1941,7 @@ static int __init iommu_prepare_with_active_regions(struct pci_dev *pdev)
return data.ret;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_DMAR_GFX_WA
static void __init iommu_prepare_gfx_mapping(void)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
@@ -2081,7 +2080,6 @@ static int domain_add_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain,
static int iommu_prepare_static_identity_mapping(void)
{
- int i;
struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
int ret;
@@ -2091,17 +2089,10 @@ static int iommu_prepare_static_identity_mapping(void)
printk(KERN_INFO "IOMMU: Setting identity map:\n");
for_each_pci_dev(pdev) {
- for (i = 0; i < e820.nr_map; i++) {
- struct e820entry *ei = &e820.map[i];
-
- if (ei->type == E820_RAM) {
- ret = iommu_prepare_identity_map(pdev,
- ei->addr, ei->addr + ei->size);
- if (ret) {
- printk(KERN_INFO "1:1 mapping to one domain failed.\n");
- return -EFAULT;
- }
- }
+ ret = iommu_prepare_with_active_regions(pdev);
+ if (ret) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO "1:1 mapping to one domain failed.\n");
+ return -EFAULT;
}
ret = domain_add_dev_info(si_domain, pdev);
if (ret)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists