[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090626184522.GF7182@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:45:22 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: mtk.manpages@...il.com, jean-noel.cordenner@...l.net,
cmm@...ibm.com, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
mk <michael.kerrisk@...il.com>
Subject: Re: MS_I_VERSION added in 2.6.25
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 01:11:44PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 08:46:34AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Linux 2.6.25 added the MS_I_VERSION flag for inode versioning. Some
> > text on this should be added to the mount(2) man page. Could someone
> > of you provide a short description of
> >
> > * What inode versions are used for
>
> I don't think it should be documented. It should never have been a
> user-visible option to start with and I'm eventually going to fix that.
>
> The correct way to do this would be a feature flag in the superblock.
Agreed, the intention was this was something which NFSv4 would request
of the filesystem, by flipping a bit. I don't see a good reason why a
user would ever want to explicit request 64-bit version numbers, since
they're not even visible to userspace.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists