linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: block tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:39:37 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: block tree build failure

On Fri, Jun 26 2009, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Fri, June 26, 2009 12:53 pm, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Jens,
> >
> > Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > block/blk-core.c: In function '__make_request':
> > block/blk-core.c:1179: error: expected ';' before 'return'
> >
> > Caused by commit 6cf2a6c8d01514e86a8d38e4eeed402378b635dc ("Restore
> > barrier support for md and probably other virtual devices") which I have
> > reverted for today.
> 
> Arg, that's my fault - sorry.
> 
> +               bio_endio(bio, -EOPNOTSUPP)
> +                       return 0;
> 
> should of course be
> 
> +               bio_endio(bio, -EOPNOTSUPP);
> +               return 0;

I was certain I ran it through a compile cycle, sorry about that
Stephen. And Neil sending uncompiled patches, very uncool. Did you even
test it? I've pulled it for now.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/