[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k52yzbti.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 10:48:25 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: tridge@...ba.org
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, john.lanza@...ux.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ibm.com>,
Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES option
tridge@...ba.org writes:
> hpa wrote:
> > However, as such it really should be paired with a "don't even recognize
> > the shortname if a longname exists" option.
>
> Right, we could just skip the 8.3 name matching and go straight to the
> longname match in fat_search_long(). I wonder if anyone ever relies on
> the 8.3 matching when a file has a long name on Linux?
Wine or such is using it.
> > It's also questionable IMO if this shouldn't be another FAT superdriver,
> > just as we have VFAT, MS-DOS etc. we could have "purevfat".
>
> It would be only a few lines of code difference between the two
> drivers - is it worth the maintainence overhead of splitting it up?
>
> Maybe a mount option to ignore 8.3 names for files with long names
> would be better? Perhaps even the default?
It sounds like to be start of yet another UMSDOS with minimal one. I
wouldn't like to repeat UMSDOS history, i.e. I think it needs real users
and developers. If not, I wouldn't like to add.
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists