[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906272352.42022.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:52:40 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Magnus Damm <damm@...l.co.jp>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch update] PM: Introduce core framework for run-time PM of I/O devices
On Wednesday 24 June 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> > +2. Run-time PM Helper Functions and Device Fields
> > +
> > +The following helper functions are defined in drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > +and include/linux/pm_runtime.h:
> > +
> > +* void pm_runtime_init(struct device *dev);
> > +* void pm_runtime_enable(struct device *dev);
> > +* void pm_runtime_disable(struct device *dev);
> > +* int pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev);
> > +* void pm_request_suspend(struct device *dev, unsigned long delay);
> > +* int pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev);
> > +* void pm_request_resume(struct device *dev);
> > +* void pm_cancel_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev);
> > +* void pm_cancel_runtime_resume(struct device *dev);
> > +* void pm_suspend_check_children(struct device *dev, bool enable);
>
> Those *s look confusingly like pointers. Remove them?
>From the doc? OK, I can use another character. :-)
Best,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists