[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1246088759.663.106.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:45:59 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: vimal singh <vimalsingh@...com>
Cc: "tom.leiming@...il.com" <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"david-b@...bell.net" <david-b@...bell.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][MTD][NAND]: fix omap2.c compile failure and warning
On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 11:07 +0530, vimal singh wrote:
> > The 'status' you return in the case that you _have_ gone through the
> > loop is still wrong though, isn't it?
> Yes, I have corrected that in below patch. Its my bad, I did not fix it
> previously.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vimal Singh <vimalsingh at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming at gmail.com>
Er, did he? And please put proper email addresses in. If you can't find
an @ sign on your keyboard, cut and paste it from elsewhere.
> @@ -558,6 +560,7 @@ static int omap_wait(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip
> status = __raw_readb(this->IO_ADDR_R);
> - if (!(status & 0x40))
> + if (status & NAND_STATUS_READY)
> break;
Hm... now you're polling the PASS/FAIL bit in the status, not the
READY/BUSY bit. I suspect that's not going to work too well...
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists