lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906271149.56051.elendil@planet.nl>
Date:	Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:49:54 +0200
From:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [2.6.31-rc1] iwlagn (4965): no wireless due to RFKILL problem

On Friday 26 June 2009, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 14:10 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Well, with 2.6.30 hp-wmi worked together with rfkill without
> > problems. Looking at the commit logs, it looks like the rfkill
> > rewrite by Johannes and Alan is the cause here. CCs added.
>
> Hmm, looks like there might be another polarity error, try this:
> -       int query = BIT(b + 8) | ((!!blocked) << b);
> +       int query = BIT(b + 8) | ((!blocked) << b);

Thanks Johannes, that makes wireless work again.

However, I just saw another possible issue.

When I disable wireless using the hardware switch and the enable it again
almost immediately after on 2.6.30, I get:
[disable]
iwlagn 0000:10:00.0: Radio Frequency Kill Switch is On:
Kill switch must be turned off for wireless networking to work.
usb 3-1: USB disconnect, address 2
[enable]
Registered led device: iwl-phy0::radio
Registered led device: iwl-phy0::assoc
Registered led device: iwl-phy0::RX
Registered led device: iwl-phy0::TX
usb 3-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 3
usb 3-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
wlan0: no probe response from AP 00:14:c1:38:e5:15 - disassociating
iwlagn 0000:10:00.0: index 0 not used in uCode key table.
wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:14:c1:38:e5:15
wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:14:c1:38:e5:15
wlan0: authenticated
wlan0: associate with AP 00:14:c1:38:e5:15
wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 00:14:c1:38:e5:15 (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=1)
wlan0: associated

And without any other action networking is up again.

With 2.6.31 I get this:
[disable]
wlan0: deauthenticating by local choice (reason=3)
iwlagn 0000:10:00.0: Error sending REPLY_ADD_STA: enqueue_hcmd failed: -5
mac80211-phy0: failed to remove key (0, 00:14:c1:38:e5:15) from hardware (-5)
iwlagn 0000:10:00.0: Error sending REPLY_ADD_STA: enqueue_hcmd failed: -5
mac80211-phy0: failed to remove key (1, ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) from hardware (-5)
usb 3-1: USB disconnect, address 2
[enable]
usb 3-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 3
usb 3-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice

A lot uglier with those errors. And after that I have to run ifdown/ifup
before networking is up again (ifup only does not work as it will complain
"interface already configured"):

[ifdown wlan0]
Registered led device: iwl-phy0::radio
Registered led device: iwl-phy0::assoc
Registered led device: iwl-phy0::RX
Registered led device: iwl-phy0::TX
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
[ifup wlan 0]
Registered led device: iwl-phy0::radio
Registered led device: iwl-phy0::assoc
Registered led device: iwl-phy0::RX
Registered led device: iwl-phy0::TX
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:14:c1:38:e5:15
wlan0: authenticated
wlan0: associate with AP 00:14:c1:38:e5:15
wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:14:c1:38:e5:15 (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=1)
wlan0: associated
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready

BTW, would it make sense to bring back the first two lines shown with .30
(or at least the first one):
   iwlagn 0000:10:00.0: Radio Frequency Kill Switch is On:
   Kill switch must be turned off for wireless networking to work.
IMHO it's good to register the reason for the disconnect.

Cheers,
FJP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ