linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] acpi processor: simplify needlessly complex printk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200906290028.33285.elendil@planet.nl>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:28:32 +0200
From:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To:	"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi processor: simplify needlessly complex printk

On Monday 29 June 2009, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> Would it be better to capitalize the S and add a period at the
> end, or does it not matter?

Kernel messages are in general not sentences.

I thought of removing the parenteses, but if you look at the context of 
the message then that only makes sense if other messages are modified at 
the same time. The messages below appear together for my system and their 
consistency could definitely be improved, but IMO that's better done in a 
separate patch.

ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2] C3[C3])
processor LNXCPU:00: registered as cooling_device7
ACPI: Processor [CPU0] (supports 8 throttling states)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/