linux-kernel - Re: [KVM PATCH v5 4/4] KVM: add irqfd DEASSIGN feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A476476.9050908@novell.com>
Date:	Sun, 28 Jun 2009 08:39:18 -0400
From:	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, davidel@...ilserver.org,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v5 4/4] KVM: add irqfd DEASSIGN feature

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:28:32AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>   
>> DEASSIGN allows us to optionally disassociate an IRQFD from its underlying
>> eventfd without destroying the eventfd in the process.  This is useful
>> for conditions like live-migration which may have an eventfd associated
>> with a device and an IRQFD.  We need to be able to decouple the guest
>> from the event source while not perturbing the event source itself.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
>> CC: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>
>>  include/linux/kvm.h |    2 ++
>>  virt/kvm/eventfd.c  |   56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm.h b/include/linux/kvm.h
>> index 38ff31e..6710518 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/kvm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/kvm.h
>> @@ -490,6 +490,8 @@ struct kvm_x86_mce {
>>  };
>>  #endif
>>  
>> +#define KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN (1 << 0)
>> +
>>  struct kvm_irqfd {
>>  	__u32 fd;
>>  	__u32 gsi;
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
>> index ca21e8a..2d4549c 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
>> @@ -180,8 +180,8 @@ irqfd_ptable_queue_proc(struct file *file, wait_queue_head_t *wqh,
>>  	add_wait_queue(wqh, &irqfd->wait);
>>  }
>>  
>> -int
>> -kvm_irqfd(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi, int flags)
>> +static int
>> +kvm_irqfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi)
>>  {
>>  	struct _irqfd *irqfd;
>>  	struct file *file = NULL;
>> @@ -303,6 +303,58 @@ irqfd_shutdown(struct _irqfd *irqfd)
>>  	irqfd_release(irqfd);
>>  }
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * assumes kvm->irqfds.lock is held
>> + */
>> +static struct _irqfd *
>> +irqfd_find(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi)
>> +{
>> +	struct _irqfd *irqfd, *tmp, *ret = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>> +	struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd;
>> +
>> +	eventfd = eventfd_ctx_fdget(fd);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(eventfd))
>> +		return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(eventfd));
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(irqfd, tmp, &kvm->irqfds.items, list) {
>> +		if (irqfd->eventfd == eventfd && irqfd->gsi == gsi) {
>> +			irqfd_deactivate(irqfd);
>> +			ret = irqfd;
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
>> +	eventfd_ctx_put(eventfd);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +kvm_irqfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi)
>> +{
>> +	struct _irqfd *irqfd;
>> +
>> +	irqfd = irqfd_find(kvm, fd, gsi);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(irqfd))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(irqfd);
>> +
>> +	irqfd_shutdown(irqfd);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>>     
>
>
> I think that, to make this work properly, you must
> add irqfd to list the last thing so do.
> As it is, when you assign irqfd, the last thing you do is
>
>         irqfd->eventfd = eventfd;
>   

Yeah, I agree.  I actually already replied to this effect on the thread
for 3/4. ;)

> I think you should move this to within a spinlock.
>   

I think if I fix the ordering, the list spinlock should be sufficient. 
Am I missing something?

>   
>> +
>> +int
>> +kvm_irqfd(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi, int flags)
>> +{
>> +	if (flags & KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN)
>> +		return kvm_irqfd_deassign(kvm, fd, gsi);
>> +
>> +	return kvm_irqfd_assign(kvm, fd, gsi);
>> +}
>> +
>>     
>
>
> At some point we discussed limiting the number of
> irqfds that can be created in some way, so that userspace
> can not consume unlimited amount of kernel memory.
>
> What happened to that idea?
>   

Yeah, that is a good question.  I thought I had already done that, too,
but now I don't know what happened to the logic.  Perhaps it got lost on
a respin somewhere.  I will look into this and add the feature.

> This will happen naturally if
> - we keep fget on the file until irqfd goes away
> - we allow the same file be bound to only one irqfd
> but there might be other ways to do this
>
>   



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (267 bytes)