[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090629071451.GA20225@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:14:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sfi-devel@...plefirmware.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 19
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus
> > > (or ask him to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you
> > > deem it necessary.
> >
> > The patches are tested on the pre-release platform that makes
> > use of them. There have been several internal reviews and
> > re-writes, but since we just got permission to release the
> > patches last week, they've not been publically vetted yet.
> >
> > The content is quite close to what I plan to propose for
> > upstream, but the format is not. I'll be re-factoring the
> > series into "clean history" and senting them to LKML on Sunday
> > night.
> >
> > I don't expect much comment on the generic part, but will want
> > x86 maintainers to buy into the parts that touch their
> > architecture.
>
> OK, then I think I need to hear from the x86 maintainers, at
> least, before we include this.
Yep, feel free, the SFI bits looked good in principle.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists