[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A487D2C.2020007@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:37:00 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mtosatti@...hat.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, markmc@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] kvm: remove in_range and switch to rwsem for iobus
On 06/28/2009 10:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> This changes bus accesses to use high-level kvm_io_bus_read/kvm_io_bus_write
> functions, which utilize read/write semaphore intead of mutex. in_range now
> becomes unused so it is removed from device ops in favor of read/write
> callbacks performing range checks internally.
>
> This allows aliasing (mostly for in-kernel virtio), as well as better error
> handling by making it possible to pass errors up to userspace. And it's enough
> to look at the diffstat to see that it's a better API anyway.
>
> While we are at it, document locking rules for kvm_io_device_ops.
>
> Note: since the use of the new bus_lock is localized to a small number of
> places, it will be easy to switch to srcu in the future if we so desire.
>
Looks good. But please split into a locking change patch and an API
change patch (in whatever order makes more sense).
I think you can reuse slots_lock instead of adding a new lock. IIRC
slots_lock is already taken for read everywhere, so you only need to
take it for write when registering things.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists